Rejoinder to Sanat Nagar flyover story: In defence of engineering integrity

By: Rafiq A. Rafiq

In response to the recent Ziraat Times report that cast doubt on the planning and execution of the National Highway flyover project at Sanat Nagar, it becomes imperative to offer a balanced perspective and correct certain misconceptions that may inadvertently mislead the public.

While constructive criticism is a cornerstone of democratic discourse, the article in question seems to rely on incomplete information and inadvertently diminishes the rigorous professional efforts made by engineers, planners, and institutional authorities.

This vital infrastructure project, from its conceptualisation to execution, has faced complex challenges—ranging from the presence of high-voltage 132kV transmission lines to restricted approaches in a congested urban environment. However, it is critical to understand that no stage of this project was rushed or overlooked.

In fact, comprehensive feasibility studies, repeated technical evaluations, and rigorous internal reviews were undertaken before the project was sanctioned. These steps were facilitated by the Principal Secretary, PWD, with unwavering technical support from PWD engineers and interdepartmental collaboration. It was only after these multi-layered checks, and after the Power Department engineers submitted viable technical mitigation proposals, that the Ministry gave its final nod for execution.

It must be emphasized that engineers are trained to identify and overcome challenges, not ignore them. The Detailed Project Report (DPR) was developed with care, commitment, and deep technical foresight. Solutions such as safe vertical clearance management for transmission lines, phased construction modules, and future tower realignments were all integrated into the project architecture—well before the first foundation was laid.

The initial proposals that failed to meet safety benchmarks were rejected internally. Only when technically sound and practically feasible remedies were finalised did the project proceed. This iterative approach reflects not negligence, but professionalism and due diligence.

It is unfortunate that the recent reporting has projected a misconceived and unduly alarmist narrative, ignoring the context of how challenges are routinely resolved in infrastructure development. While critical journalism is essential, it must be guided by accurate data, consultation with technical experts, and a fair understanding of the complexities that define large-scale public works.

Such narratives risk eroding public trust in the institutions and professionals who work under challenging conditions to deliver vital infrastructure for public benefit. Projects of this scale and importance are not free from complications, but to imply oversight where there is evidence of meticulous planning and technical problem-solving is unfair and unhelpful.

As responsible citizens, we must recognise that public infrastructure is rarely built under ideal circumstances. Our engineers, planners, and officials routinely navigate land acquisition delays, interdepartmental hurdles, and contractor constraints. Yet, they persist—driven by their responsibility to serve the public.

The Sanat Nagar Flyover, once completed, will significantly ease traffic congestion, enhance safety, and improve urban mobility. To reduce its story to a singular controversy is to overlook the broader value and the complex work behind it.

With due regard to Naveed Sheikh, Ambreen Khan, Dr. Insha Mir, and all those genuinely invested in Kashmir’s developmental journey.