Jammu: Minister of Health and Medical Education Sakeena Itoo today disclosed that funds worth ₹90.10 crore remained unspent at the Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) over the past three financial years. The lapse, attributed to an “extremely sluggish” procurement process, affected patient care and essential services at the institute.
As per the official statement the losses incurred include ₹34.16 crore, ₹21.72 crore, and ₹34.22 crore during the subsequent financial years from 2021-2024.
The disclosure came in response to a question raised by Gulmarg MLA Farooq Ahmad Shah. Minister Itoo clarified that while funds were available, inefficiencies in procurement resulted in their non-utilization, raising concerns about administrative inefficiencies at SKIMS.
“Funds were not an issue, but the procurement process was extremely sluggish,” the Minister stated. This inefficiency led to a deterioration in patient care and hospital services, sparking criticism regarding the competence and intent of the officials involved.
Sources claim that the sluggish procurement process has not only impacted healthcare services but also played a role in reducing SKIMS’ functional autonomy. Several key responsibilities of the institute, including procurement and recruitment, have been shifted to the J&K Medical Supplies Corporation, J&K Public Service Commission, and J&K Services Selection Board in recent years, added sources.
Moreover, in a controversial development, the officials responsible for this sluggish performance were reportedly honored by the Chief Minister and Chairman of the Governing Body on SKIMS Annual Day, December 5, 2024. This recognition stands in stark contrast to today’s Assembly statement, where the minister acknowledged the negative impact of their inefficiency.
Adding to the contradiction, Chief Minister Omar Abdullah had made strong commitments on SKIMS Annual Day to restore the institution’s “full functional autonomy.” However, Itoo’s statement today appears to highlight the opposite trend, raising questions about the administration’s actual stance on the matter. ENS
